The Top 5 Issues With Manuscript Cover Letter Writing

The Top 5 Issues With Manuscript Cover Letter Writing

Welcome to our blog addressing the challenges in Manuscript Cover Letter Writing. Crafting an effective cover letter for your academic work can be tricky. In this read, we’ll break down the common hurdles in the Format of Manuscript Cover Letter Writing using simple language, making it easier to grasp.

We’ll explore the importance of manuscript cover letter writing and share practical solutions for common problems. The goal of this blog is to provide clarity to the frequently perplexing process of writing a cover letter. We want to help authors, especially those new to the publishing scene, grasp the basics and improve their submissions.

Format of Manuscript Cover Letter Writing

– Use the editor’s name when addressing your work if you are acquainted with them. Add the journal to which you are submitting as well as the submission date.

– Include the title and the type of manuscript (review, research, case study, etc.) in the first paragraph of your work. Next, briefly describe the background of your research, the question you set out to answer, and your motivation.

– In the second paragraph, briefly describe the research that was done, the key conclusions, and the significance of the results.

– In the second paragraph, briefly describe the research that was done, the key conclusions, and the significance of the results.

– In the third paragraph, you should explain why the study would be of interest to the journal’s readers. Seek guidance from the objectives and reach of the journal. For instance, if the journal mandates that all published papers have broad implications, describe how your study satisfies this requirement. A sentence highlighting the significance of the findings for the field is also a good idea.

– Finally, mention the corresponding author and any conditions particular to the journal that must be met (such as ethical norms).

Now, let’s directly dive into the problems with manuscript cover letter writing with their solutions.

Problem #1: Lack of Clarity in Purpose


– Rejection Risk: Lack of clarity raises the risk of rejection as editors may struggle to discern the manuscript’s significance.

– Missed Opportunities: Researchers might miss valuable opportunities to showcase the unique contributions of their work, hindering potential collaborations or recognition.

– Communication Breakdown: A vague purpose can lead to misunderstandings, affecting how the research is perceived and hindering effective communication with the editorial team.


– Clearly state the main objective of your research in a concise and focused manner, ensuring editors understand the core purpose.

– Highlight the broader significance of your work by explaining its potential impact on the field or its relevance to real-world applications.

– To explore what might be not clear to non-specialists, send your cover letter to the mentors or colleagues who are in a different field.

Problem #2: Insufficient Tailoring to the Journal


The study is less visible and less likely to stand out among submissions customised for the particular journal when generic cover letters are used. Failing to align with the journal’s scope may result in editors feeling disconnected from the research, leading to a lack of enthusiasm for the manuscript. Researchers may miss chances for collaboration or networking by not showcasing how their work aligns with the journal’s focus.


– Thorough Journal Research: Investigate the journal’s mission, scope, and recent publications to understand its priorities and audience.

– Highlight Alignment: Clearly emphasize how your research aligns with the journal’s goals, demonstrating that you’ve considered its scope and readership.

– Reference Previous Articles: Cite relevant articles published by the journal to show familiarity and integration of your work within the existing body of research.

Problem #3: Ineffective Communication of Significance


– Ignorance of the research’s wider significance and influence can result from ineffectively conveying its importance.

– Inadequate emphasis on the broader implications may result in the research being overlooked or undervalued, limiting its recognition.

– Inability to convey the broader significance may hinder the researcher’s chances of securing additional funding or support for future projects.


– Clearly Articulate Impact: Clearly articulate the broader impact of your research, explaining how it contributes to the advancement of knowledge or addresses real-world challenges.

– Connect to Field Relevance: Demonstrate how your findings are relevant to the wider field, emphasizing the practical applications or contributions to theoretical frameworks.

– Use Concrete Examples: Support your claims with concrete examples or scenarios to help editors and readers grasp the tangible significance of your work.

Problem #4: Overly Technical Language


– Limited Accessibility: Utilizing complex technical language can alienate editors and readers who may not be specialists in the specific field, limiting the accessibility of the research.

– Reduced Clarity: Overly technical language may obscure the core message, leading to a lack of clarity in conveying the significance and findings of the research.

– Potential Misinterpretation: Readers unfamiliar with the technical terminology may misinterpret key aspects of the research, affecting the overall understanding and evaluation.


– Replace technical jargon with plain language to enhance accessibility. Strive for simplicity without compromising the accuracy of your descriptions.

– If technical terms are necessary, provide clear definitions to ensure readers can follow your argument without specialized knowledge.

– Share your cover letter with individuals outside your field to identify areas where technical language might be hindering understanding.

– To ensure that a larger audience understands the primary contributions of your research, emphasise fundamental ideas rather than getting bogged down in specifics.

Problem #5: Neglecting to Address Potential Concerns


Ignoring such issues creates uncertainty for editors and reviewers, which could affect the manuscript’s evaluation process and reception in general. The credibility of the research may be weakened if oversights or a lack of thoroughness are perceived as a result of failing to foresee and address difficulties. Scholars could overlook significant opportunities to proactively address potential problems, which could lead to improvements in manuscripts.


– Anticipate Critiques: Proactively consider potential critiques of your research methodology, results, or interpretations, and address them in your cover letter.

– Provide Explanations: Offer clear explanations for any limitations or potential alternative interpretations, demonstrating a thoughtful approach to your research.

– Solicit Feedback: Seek feedback from colleagues or mentors to identify potential concerns that you might have overlooked, ensuring a more comprehensive cover letter.

Final Thoughts

Writing a good cover letter for your manuscript is super important. The way you structure it, called the Format of Manuscript Cover Letter Writing, can sometimes be tricky. Problems like not being clear about your purpose or not tailoring your letter to a specific journal can make it tough. But there are many importance of manuscript cover letter writing! By keeping things clear and making your letter fit the journal well, you can overcome these issues.

Understanding the importance of manuscript cover letter writing is like having a secret weapon in the world of academic publishing. It’s not just about following the rules; it’s about showing why your research matters. Thus, prevent employing too many complex phrases and try to respond to any issues that editors may have concerning your article. provides a manuscript cover letter writing service for researchers who are looking to publish their work in academic journals. The cover letter is an essential part of the manuscript, and it is critical to have a strong and effective one to support your paper.’s writing experts create customized cover letters that reflect the true significance of your study and highlight the importance of your research work. 

Before crafting a persuasive cover letter for your research topic, the writing professionals at ensure that they have a thorough understanding of it. They write crisp letters that appeal to journal editors instantly so that your work may be forwarded for peer review without delay. If you want to know more about the way we can help you, email to them at

FAQ Questions

1. What is the objective of a Manuscript cover letter?

A manuscript cover letter should serve to introduce the work, emphasise its importance, and pique the editor’s attention.

2. How do you write a good cover letter for a manuscript?

To write a compelling cover letter needed for a manuscript, make sure it suits the journal exactly, clarify the letter’s purpose, emphasise its importance, and address any potential challenges.

3. What are the top tips for a manuscript cover letter?

The first tip is tailoring it to the journal, showcasing significance, anticipating concerns, using simple language, and expressing enthusiasm.

4. What are the key points of a manuscript cover letter?

A manuscript cover letter should state the importance of the work, thank the main contributors, tell the editor, include the required contact information, and finally convey gratitude.

3 Major Problems With the Manuscript Peer Review Proces

3 Major Problems With the Manuscript Peer Review ProcessThe Manuscript Peer Review Process plays a crucial role in the world of academic publishing, ensuring the quality and reliability of scientific research before it reaches the public. There are different types of Manuscript peer review, such as single-blind, double-blind, and open review, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. However, despite its significance, this process is not without its flaws. In this blog, we will delve into three major problems that can arise within the Manuscript Peer Review. By understanding these issues, we aim to shed light on the need for continuous improvement and innovation in this vital aspect of academic scholarship. Recognizing the Types of Manuscript review and comprehending the Importance of Manuscript Peer review is essential in addressing these challenges effectively.

Before diving into the problems, let us know the types of Manuscript Review so that we can easily understand the importance of Manuscript Peer review, their problems and also their SOLUTIONS.

Types of Manuscript Peer Review

– Single-Blind Review:

In this type, the reviewers know the author’s identity, but the author remains unaware of who reviewed their manuscript.

– Double-Blind Review:

Both the author and the reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This aims to minimize potential biases in the evaluation process.

– Open Review:

This involves revealing the identities of both the author and the reviewers. It promotes transparency and accountability in the peer review process.

– Post-Publication Review:

Reviews are conducted after the manuscript is published, allowing for ongoing evaluation and feedback from the scientific community.

– Collaborative Review:

Multiple reviewers work together to assess the manuscript, providing a collective perspective on its quality and validity.

– Pre-Submission Review:

Feedback is obtained before formal submission, helping authors improve their work before undergoing the official peer review process.

Problem 1: Bias and Subjectivity


Bias and subjectivity in the Manuscript Peer Review can lead to unfair evaluations and hinder the publication of high-quality research. Here’s how it poses a challenge:

– Unintentional Favoritism: Reviewers may unknowingly favor certain authors, institutions, or research topics, impacting the impartiality of the review.

– Inconsistent Judgments: Different reviewers may have varying opinions on the significance or novelty of a study, leading to inconsistent assessments.

– Potential for Prejudice: Personal beliefs or affiliations may influence a reviewer’s judgment, potentially leading to unfair rejections or acceptances.


To address bias and subjectivity, several strategies can be implemented:

Implementing double-blind or even triple-blind review processes, where both the author and reviewers remain anonymous, can help mitigate biases related to author identity.

Ensuring a diverse pool of reviewers from different backgrounds and perspectives can help counteract potential biases and provide a more well-rounded evaluation.

Establishing clear and objective criteria for evaluating manuscripts can guide reviewers and reduce the impact of subjective judgments.

Providing training and specific guidelines to reviewers on how to recognize and avoid bias can help improve the quality and fairness of reviews.

Editors can monitor the performance of reviewers and provide feedback to address any observed biases or inconsistencies.

Introducing an appeals process allows authors to contest decisions based on potential bias, providing an additional layer of oversight.

Problem 2: Time-Consuming and Lengthy Delays


The Manuscript Peer Review Process can often be time-consuming, causing significant delays in the dissemination of important research. Here’s why this poses a challenge:

Reviewers, who are also active researchers, may have limited time to dedicate to the review process, leading to delays in providing feedback. Coordinating schedules between authors, reviewers, and editors can lead to prolonged periods before a manuscript receives a thorough evaluation. Lengthy review times can result in a substantial gap between the completion of research and its eventual publication, slowing down the advancement of knowledge.


To address the issue of time-consuming delays, several measures can be implemented:

– Set Clear Timelines: Editors should establish clear and reasonable timelines for each stage of the review process, ensuring timely evaluations.

– Efficient Communication: Encouraging prompt communication between authors, reviewers, and editors can expedite the review process and minimize delays.

– Prioritize Early-Stage Feedback: Providing initial feedback to authors at an early stage, even before formal peer review, can help address major issues upfront, saving time in the long run.

– Use Technology and Automation: Leveraging technology for tasks like manuscript tracking, reminders, and notifications can streamline the review process and reduce administrative delays.

– Assign Dedicated Editors: Having dedicated editors overseeing the review process can help ensure that reviews are conducted promptly and efficiently.

Problem 3: Inadequate Identification of Errors and Flaws


The Manuscript Peer Review may not always catch all errors, methodological flaws, or inaccuracies in a manuscript. This poses a significant challenge:

Some mistakes or shortcomings in a manuscript may go unnoticed during the review process, potentially leading to the dissemination of flawed or unreliable research.

Reviewers may have varying expertise levels or may not have the specific knowledge needed to identify certain types of errors or flaws.

Errors may only come to light after the research has been published, potentially requiring corrections or retractions.


To address the issue of inadequate error and flaw identification, several strategies can be put in place:

Ensuring that reviewers have a broad range of expertise relevant to the manuscript’s subject matter can help uncover a wider array of potential issues. Editors can emphasize the importance of thorough and detailed reviews, encouraging reviewers to carefully scrutinize all aspects of the manuscript. Employing plagiarism detection software and other digital tools can help identify potential issues, such as duplication or data fabrication. Implementing mechanisms for post-publication monitoring and correction, such as a system for errata or retractions, can address any errors that emerge after publication. Providing ongoing training and resources for reviewers can enhance their ability to identify and address potential errors and flaws.


In conclusion, the Manuscript Peer Review Process, a cornerstone of academic publishing, plays a pivotal role in upholding the quality and credibility of scientific research. While the various Types of Manuscript peer review offer different approaches to evaluation, they are not without their challenges. The issues of bias and subjectivity, time-consuming delays, and the potential for inadequate error identification highlight areas for improvement. Recognizing these hurdles is crucial in ensuring that the Importance of Manuscript Peer review is maximized. By implementing strategies like blind reviews, clear timelines, and diverse reviewer expertise, we can work towards a more efficient and equitable peer review process. This will not only enhance the reliability of published research but also accelerate the advancement of knowledge in the scientific community. is a website that provides manuscript peer review services to PhD students. Peer review is an essential process that ensures the quality of research papers before they are published in academic journals.’s peer review service is designed to help students improve the quality and relevance of their work for their target journal. The service includes a thorough analysis of research questions, formulated hypotheses, and the significance of the study. The peer reviewers also evaluate the factual accuracy, correct usage of tests and experiments, appropriate methodology and analysis, and apt conclusion. They also check aspects like grammar, vocabulary, content structure, and presentation of logical content within the context of the rules and standards defined by your chosen journal.’s peer reviewers offer constructive feedback that helps students improve upon their already done hard work. This lets students submit a suitable paper oriented towards their target readers.

FAQ Questions

1. What are the key elements of manuscript peer review?

The key elements of manuscript peer review include evaluation by experts in the field, feedback on methodology, analysis, and interpretation, and recommendations for improvement.

2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of manuscript peer review?

The advantages of manuscript peer review include quality assurance, validation of research findings, and improvement of manuscript quality. Disadvantages can include potential bias, lengthy review times, and the possibility of errors going unnoticed.

3. What are the main aims of doing manuscript peer review?

The main aims of doing manuscript peer review are to ensure the reliability and credibility of research, provide constructive feedback to authors for improvement, and determine if a manuscript is suitable for publication.

4. What is the manuscript peer review format?

The manuscript peer review format typically involves a structured assessment of the introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion sections, along with comments and recommendations for the authors.


Quantitative vs. Qualitative in Thesis Questionnaire Development

Quantitative vs. Qualitative in Thesis Questionnaire Development

As you start your research journey, especially in thesis questionnaire Development, you’ll come across a crucial task: making a PhD thesis questionnaire development process. It’s like a big puzzle piece that shapes your entire study. You might wonder, “How to develop a questionnaire for a research paper?” This question uncovers a very important part of your research adventure. The choice between using a research questionnaire or taking help from other services will really affect how much you can learn from your research.

Complementary Nature of Quantitative and Qualitative Data

1. Quantitative Data:

– Objective Measurement: Involves numerical values and objective measurements.

– Statistical Analysis: Analyzed using statistical techniques to identify patterns, relationships, and trends.

– Closed-ended Questions: Typically derived from structured questionnaires with predetermined response options.

– Generalizability: Allows for broader generalizations to a larger population.

– Precision and Reliability: Offers precise numerical values, enhancing reliability.

2. Qualitative Data:

– Contextual Understanding: Provides in-depth context, insights, and meanings behind phenomena.

– Thematic Analysis: Analyzed through techniques like coding to identify themes and patterns.

– Open-ended Questions: Allows respondents to express themselves freely, capturing rich, nuanced information.

– Richness and Depth: Captures subjective experiences, emotions, and perspectives, which quantitative data may miss.

– Exploratory and Descriptive: Used for exploring new topics or gaining in-depth understanding.

Triangulation – The Integration of Data Types

Triangulation is a powerful research method that involves combining different types of data – quantitative and qualitative – to enhance the credibility and validity of findings. This approach seeks to minimize biases and errors by cross-verifying information from multiple sources.

Contextualizing Quantitative Results

Quantitative data, though informative in terms of numerical trends and patterns, often lacks the ‘why’ behind these phenomena. This is where qualitative data steps in. Qualitative data helps to contextualize and explain the quantitative results.

Illustrating Quantitative Trends

Qualitative data serves as a valuable tool for illustrating and exemplifying quantitative findings. While charts, graphs, and statistics provide a visual representation of trends, they may not always resonate with the audience on a personal or relatable level.

Sequential and Concurrent Data Collection

1. Sequential Exploratory Design

In a sequential exploratory design, qualitative data is gathered first. This initial phase of data collection informs the development of structured quantitative instruments.

2. Convergent Design

Convergent design, on the other hand, involves the simultaneous collection of both quantitative and qualitative data. This concurrent approach allows for the integration of different perspectives right from the outset.

Item Development for Questionnaires

1. Quantitative Item Development:

– Structured Format: Questions are typically closed-ended, with predetermined response options.

– Clear and Unambiguous Language: Ensures respondents interpret questions uniformly.

–  Avoiding Leading or Loaded Questions: Minimizes bias and ensures neutrality in responses.

– Likert Scales and Rating Scales: Commonly used to measure attitudes, opinions, or behaviors with varying degrees of agreement or frequency.

2. Qualitative Item Development:

– Open-ended Format: Encourages participants to provide detailed, narrative responses.

– Non-Directive Language: Allows respondents to express themselves freely without influencing their answers.

– Probing or Follow-up Prompts: Included to elicit deeper insights or clarify responses.

– Sensitive to Context: Questions may be tailored to specific situations or experiences, capturing nuances.

Considerations for Item Development:

1. Cognitive Interviews: In both quantitative and qualitative item development, cognitive interviews are crucial. They involve testing questions with a sample of participants to identify any misunderstandings, ambiguities, or difficulties in responding.

2. Pilot Testing: Before finalizing the questionnaire, it’s essential to conduct pilot tests to evaluate the clarity, relevance, and appropriateness of the items.

3. Balancing Sensitivity and Specificity: Quantitative items aim for specificity to generate precise data, while qualitative items emphasize sensitivity to capture diverse perspectives.

Sampling Strategies and Data Collection

1. Quantitative Sampling and Data Collection:

– Random Sampling Techniques: Employ methods like simple random sampling, stratified sampling, or cluster sampling to ensure each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected.

– Large Sample Sizes: Often necessary to achieve statistical power and representativeness.

– Structured Surveys and Questionnaires: Employ standardized instruments for consistent data collection.

– Statistical Analysis: Utilize statistical software for data processing and analysis.

2. Qualitative Sampling and Data Collection:

– Purposeful Sampling: Often used to select participants based on specific criteria relevant to the research question, such as expertise or experience.

– Data Saturation: Continue data collection until no new information or themes emerge, indicating theoretical saturation.

– In-depth interviews, Focus Groups, Observations: Employ open-ended methods to elicit rich, detailed responses and observations.

Considerations for Sampling and Data Collection:

Ethical considerations form the bedrock of any research endeavor. It is imperative to uphold the rights and well-being of participants throughout the data collection process. This involves obtaining informed consent, a process wherein participants are provided with clear information about the study’s purpose, procedures, and potential risks and benefits, allowing them to make an informed decision about their participation.

Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Data Collection:

In the realm of data collection, two distinct approaches offer unique advantages. The sequential exploratory design involves commencing with qualitative data collection. This initial phase allows researchers to delve deeply into the subject matter, gaining rich, context-specific insights.

Analytical Techniques and Interpretation

1. Quantitative Data Analysis:

– Descriptive Statistics: Summarize and present data in a meaningful way, including measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and dispersion (variance, standard deviation).

– Inferential Statistics: Draw conclusions and make predictions about a population based on a sample using techniques like t-tests, ANOVA, regression analysis, etc.

– Advanced Techniques: Employ specialized methods such as structural equation modeling, multilevel modeling, or latent variable analysis for complex relationships.

2. Qualitative Data Analysis:

– Thematic Analysis: Identify and analyze recurring themes or patterns within the qualitative data.

– Grounded Theory: Develop theories or conceptual frameworks based on the emergent themes and concepts from the data.

– Content Analysis: Systematically categorize and analyze textual or visual data to draw meaningful conclusions.

PhD thesis Questionnaire Development Process

1. Quantitative Questionnaire Development:

– Research Objectives Clarification: Clearly define the research questions and objectives that the questionnaire aims to address.

– Literature Review: Identify existing scales, instruments, or validated questions relevant to the research area. This can serve as a foundation for item development.

– Item Generation: Create a pool of potential items, ensuring they are clear, unambiguous, and relevant to the research objectives.

– Pilot Testing: Administer the questionnaire to a small sample to identify any issues with item wording, clarity, or response options.

– Finalization: Based on pilot test feedback, refine and finalize the questionnaire for the main data collection.

2. Qualitative Questionnaire Development:

– Research Objectives Clarification: Clearly define the qualitative research questions and objectives that the questionnaire aims to address.

– Theoretical Framework: Ground the questionnaire in relevant theoretical concepts or frameworks that guide the development of items.

– Open-ended Questions Crafting: Develop open-ended questions that encourage participants to provide detailed, narrative responses.

– Pilot Testing: Administer the questionnaire to a small sample to evaluate the clarity and relevance of questions.

– Refinement: Basedquantitative-vs-qualitative-in-thesis-questionnaire-development on pilot test feedback, refine and finalize the questionnaire for the main data collection.

Final Thoughts

As we come to the end of our talk about thesis questionnaire development, it’s clear that the way we choose to make our surveys really matters using PhD thesis questionnaire development process. When we work on our PhD theses and make our questions, we see how important this step is. Deciding between using numbers or stories shapes the kind of information we get. So, when you think, “How to develop a questionnaire for a research paper?”, Keep in mind that the method you use matters just as much as the words you put down. This choice decides how much we can learn in our studies. Whether you choose numbers or stories, both ways are valuable in their own special way.

Authenu is a platform that offers scientific manuscript writing services for research students who face difficulties in editing, writing, and formatting their manuscripts. Authenu’s services include manuscript writing, journal article writing, and research support. They aim to provide timely and high-quality research support services regarding thesis questionnaire development to help scholars present clear and comprehensive manuscripts to journals. Authenu’s team of professionals can assist researchers at any stage of their research, from identifying research gaps to sharing research ideas with the world. They also offer publication search services to find ISI journals or upcoming conferences and seminars for disseminating research findings. By leveraging Authenu’s expertise, PhD researchers can receive valuable assistance in developing questionnaires for their research projects. So if you are still thinking about “How to develop a questionnaire for a research paper”, consider visiting

FAQ Questions

1. What are the steps in developing a questionnaire?

Steps in developing a questionnaire: Define research objectives, choose the response format, draft questions, pre-test, revise, and finalize.

2. What are the qualities of a good questionnaire?

Qualities of a good questionnaire: Clarity, relevance, simplicity, neutrality, specificity, and order.

3. What are the major components of a good questionnaire?

Major components of a good questionnaire: Introduction, instructions, demographic questions, main survey questions, closing, and contact information.

4. What are the types of questionnaires?

Types of questionnaires: Structured, semi-structured, unstructured, open-ended, closed-ended, and mixed-methods.

How to derive research gap in doctoral study

Have you heard of these research gaps: “Practical Research Gap” and “Knowledge Application Research Gap”? Learn about it in less than 5 minutes

Research shows that about 3.54% of research papers get rejected just because of not properly identifying and resolving the research gap. In this blog, we will cover two of the most underrated research gaps such as the Practical Research Gap and the Knowledge Application Research Gap. Apart from knowing what those are, we will also know why we need to give importance to these research gaps and how to implement these in our research so that we can find the gaps and make the research better. So, let’s begin.

But before that, let us know the answers to some basic questions which will help us to understand this blog easier. The first one is how to write a research gap. For this, you have to review the existing literature, identify the research question, determine the scope of the research gap, explain the significance of the research gap and provide evidence to support it.

Now, the second question comes which is how to identify the research gap. This also incorporates conducting a thorough literature review, looking for inconsistencies or contradictions in the literature, identifying limitations in previous research, looking for unanswered research questions and considering new developments in the field.

Finally, as we all know there are several types of research gap in research such as practical research and knowledge application research gap. But only these two? What about theoretical, empirical, methodological and conceptual research gaps? Why haven’t I covered this in this blog? This you will know only after reading this blog. So, keep on reading.

A practical research gap refers to a problem or issue that exists in a particular field of study that needs to be addressed through research. This gap could be a lack of understanding of a particular phenomenon, a need for more empirical data to support a theoretical framework or a need for the development of new techniques or tools to solve a problem.

Identifying a practical research gap is an essential step in conducting research as it helps researchers to focus their efforts and resources on areas that are most in need of attention. It also helps to ensure that the research conducted is relevant and useful to practitioners and policymakers in the field.

I hope you have gathered an idea about the practical research gap but you may have a question in your mind: why use a practical research gap in your research? So, let us know the answer.

Using a practical research gap in your research helps to ensure that your work is relevant and meaningful to the field you are studying. By identifying a gap in the existing knowledge or practice, you can focus your research efforts on addressing this gap and contributing to the advancement of the field.

How can you identify the relevance of your research with the help of the Practical Research Gap? By identifying a practical research gap, you can ensure that your research is relevant to the needs of practitioners and policymakers in the field. You can identify the relevance by first defining the practical problem, conducting a literature review, identifying the research gap and determining the significance. Another benefit of using a practical research gap is it is helpful to solve real-world problems and improve outcomes for individuals or organizations in the field. So, it is two targets with one stone.

Filling a practical research gap often involves developing new methods, tools, or approaches, which can lead to innovation and new discoveries in the field. The new methods include data collection, analysis, ethical consideration, reproducibility, multidisciplinary approaches and dissemination and communication. The new approaches which can be developed using the practical research gap include participatory, mixed-methods, action, interdisciplinary, community-based and longitudinal research.

Can it influence future research and practice? By filling a practical research gap, you can make a significant contribution to the existing body of knowledge in the field, and potentially influence future research and practice.

Nonetheless, there remains an issue. The problem is you may want to use the practical research gap in your research but you may not get the full benefit of using it. The reason is that there are several factors to be considered. So, let us know the factors to consider while using a practical research gap.
When using a practical research gap in your research.

There are several key factors that you should consider:

How to write a research gap

Feasibility: The research question should be feasible to answer within the scope of the study and the available resources.

Clarity: The research question should be clearly defined and specific to ensure that the study stays focused and is able to provide clear and meaningful results.

Methodology: The methodology used to answer the research question should be appropriate and rigorous, using reliable and valid data sources and analytical methods.

Ethics: The study should be conducted in an ethical manner, taking into account issues such as confidentiality, informed consent, and the potential impact of the research on participants and the broader community.

Impact: The research should have a clear impact on the field, providing new insights, tools, or approaches that can be used by practitioners and policymakers to address the practical research gap.
Now that we have gathered most of the knowledge about the practical research gap, let us know how to use the practical research gap in our PhD research.

To conduct a successful PhD research, it is crucial to identify the field of study and focus on a specific area of knowledge. A thorough review of existing literature is then necessary to identify gaps in knowledge, areas of disagreement, or practical issues that have not yet been addressed by previous research.

Based on the review of the literature, research questions should be formulated that address practical research gaps in the field of study. These questions must be specific, clear, and feasible to answer within the scope of the PhD research. A research plan should then be developed, outlining the methodology to be used to answer the research questions. The plan should be rigorous, taking into account issues such as sample size, data collection methods, and analytical techniques.

In conducting research using the methodology outlined in the research plan, data should be collected and analyzed to answer the research questions. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the practical research gap identified in the field of study. The implications of the findings for practitioners and policymakers should be discussed, and areas for further research should be identified.

Finally, the dissertation should be written, incorporating the research questions, research plan, and findings into a cohesive narrative that addresses the practical research gap identified in the field of study. By identifying and resolving research gaps, the research can be made perfect.

Still, there’s something left to discuss which is the problems associated with the practical research gap. So, let us know then.

The practical research gap refers to the gap between academic research and its application in real-world settings.

Some of the problems associated with this gap include:

How to derive research gap in doctoral study

Lack of relevance: Often, academic research focuses on topics that may not be relevant to the practical needs of industry or society. As a result, the research findings may not be applicable in real-world settings.

Limited accessibility: Academic research is often published in academic journals or presented at conferences, which may not be easily accessible to practitioners or the general public. This can limit the dissemination of research findings and prevent their application in real-world settings.

Time lag: The time it takes for academic research to be published and disseminated can create a time lag between when the research is conducted and when it can be applied in practical settings. This lag can lead to missed opportunities for innovation and improvement.

Lack of collaboration: Collaboration between researchers and practitioners can help bridge the gap between academic research and practical applications. However, there is often a need for more cooperation between these groups, which can limit the practical application of research findings.

Limited resources: Practical research often requires resources such as funding, equipment, and access to data. These resources may not be available to practitioners, limiting their ability to apply research findings in real-world settings.

Resistance to change: Even when research findings are relevant and accessible, there may be resistance to change among practitioners or industry leaders. This can limit the adoption of new practices or technologies based on research findings.

If you want to know anything else about the practical research gap, then you can let us know in the comments. So, let’s jump into the “knowledge application research gap”.

The knowledge application research gap refers to the difference or discrepancy between what is known through research and what is being applied in practice. It occurs when there is a failure to transfer or apply research findings to real-world situations or when research is not conducted on the specific practical problems that need to be addressed.

This gap can occur for several reasons, including lack of communication between researchers and practitioners, limited resources for implementation, insufficient training and support for practitioners, and differences in the context or setting in which research is conducted versus where it is applied.
Now, like the previous research gap, let us know why the knowledge application research gap portrays an essential role while conducting research.

How does the knowledge application research gap improve the effectiveness of interventions? By addressing the knowledge application research gap, researchers can identify the practical barriers and challenges that prevent the translation of research findings into effective interventions. This can help improve the implementation of interventions and lead to better outcomes for individuals and communities.

Researchers can identify areas where additional research is needed to address practical problems and improve the application of research findings in practice by understanding the knowledge application research gap. They can do it by reviewing the literature, consulting experts and  prioritizing the research needs.

Researchers can work collaboratively with practitioners to identify practical solutions and promote the implementation of evidence-based practices through the knowledge application research gap. However, this can be done by identifying the facilitators and barriers, engaging stakeholders, developing and testing interventions, using the framework of implementation science and disseminating the findings.

By focusing on the knowledge application research gap, researchers can ensure that their work has practical applications and can be used to improve people’s lives. This can help increase the impact and relevance of research, and promote the use of research for positive social change. It can be done with the help of the advancement of technology and innovation.

Researchers can identify practical solutions that can help address social inequalities and promote social justice with the help of the knowledge application research gap. This can be done by implementing evidence-based interventions, conducting research on the root causes of social inequalities, fostering community engagement, addressing implicit bias and discrimination, advocating for change and disseminating findings and promoting policy change.

Unlike the practical research gap. There are various factors to consider while using the knowledge application research gap in your PhD research. But what are those?

When using the knowledge application research gap in your PhD research, there are several factors to consider.

Here are some of the key factors:

Research question: Your research question should be focused on a practical problem or issue that has not been adequately addressed by existing research. You should consider how your research can contribute to bridging the knowledge application research gap in your chosen area.

Literature review: A thorough literature review is essential to identify the existing research on your topic and to identify gaps in the literature that your research can address. You should consider how your research can build upon existing knowledge and contribute to the knowledge application research gap.

Research design: Your research design should be tailored to address the research question and to fill the knowledge application research gap. You should consider using implementation science frameworks to guide your research design and to ensure that your research is relevant to the practical problem you are addressing.

Data collection and analysis: Your data collection and analysis methods should be appropriate for your research question and research design. You should consider how your data can be analyzed and reported in a way that is useful for practitioners and policymakers.

Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholder engagement is essential to ensure that your research is relevant to the practical problem you are addressing. You should consider how to engage with stakeholders, such as healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients, to ensure that your research is aligned with their needs and priorities.

Dissemination: Dissemination of your research findings is essential to promote the application of your research in practice. You should consider how to disseminate your findings to academic and non-academic audiences, including policymakers, practitioners, and patients.

Now, again we have come to the question of how to use the knowledge application research gap in your research.

Using the knowledge application research gap in your research involves identifying a practical problem or issue that has not been adequately addressed by existing research and developing a research plan that aims to fill the gap by generating evidence that can be applied in practice.

You need to first Identify a practical problem or issue that is important to stakeholders and that has not been adequately addressed by existing research. This could be a gap in knowledge, a need for improved interventions, or a need for more effective implementation strategies.

You also have to conduct a comprehensive literature review to identify existing research on the problem or issue you have identified. This will help you to understand what is already known about the problem, identify gaps in the literature, and develop a research question that addresses the knowledge application research gap.

It is very important to develop a research question that is focused on addressing the knowledge application research gap you have identified. The research question should be specific, feasible, and relevant to stakeholders.

Choose a research design that is appropriate for your research question and that can generate evidence that is applicable in practice. Consider using implementation science frameworks to guide your research design and ensure that your research is relevant to the practical problem you are addressing.

Engaging stakeholders is one of the most crucial aspects of all of them. Engage stakeholders throughout the research process to ensure that your research is aligned with their needs and priorities. Stakeholder engagement can help to ensure that your research is relevant, practical, and applicable in practice.

Finally, disseminate your research findings to academic and non-academic audiences, including policymakers, practitioners, and patients. Dissemination of findings is essential to promote the application of your research in practice and to ensure that your research has an impact on the problem or issue you have identified.

So, which are the problems associated with the knowledge application research gap.

There are several problems associated with the knowledge application research gap, including:

Lack of alignment between research and practice: One of the main problems with the knowledge application research gap is that there is often a lack of alignment between research and practice. Researchers may focus on questions that are not relevant to the practical needs of stakeholders or may conduct research that is not feasible or applicable in practice.

Limited generalizability of research findings: Another problem with the knowledge application research gap is that research findings may not be generalizable to different settings or populations. This can limit the applicability of research findings in practice and make it difficult for stakeholders to use research evidence to inform decision-making.

Insufficient engagement with stakeholders: Engagement with stakeholders, such as patients, practitioners, and policymakers, is critical for ensuring that research is relevant to their needs and priorities. However, there is often insufficient engagement with stakeholders in the research process, which can limit the applicability and impact of research findings.

Limited dissemination of research findings: Even when research findings are relevant and applicable to practice, there may be limited dissemination of the findings to stakeholders. This can limit the impact of research and make it difficult for stakeholders to use research evidence to inform decision-making.

Funding and resource constraints: Funding and resource constraints can limit the scope and impact of research, and may make it difficult for researchers to address the practical problems and issues that are most relevant to stakeholders.

Limited capacity for implementation: Even when research generates evidence-based interventions or strategies, there may be limited capacity for implementation in practice due to factors such as lack of resources, competing priorities, and organizational barriers.

Now, the final question for which you have been eagerly waiting is how to know what gap to identify and resolve for my research. Practical Research Gap or Knowledge Application Research Gap? Well, the answer is right below.

To identify the gap in your research, you need to consider the specific problem or issue you are trying to address and the practical implications of your research. Both the practical research gap and the knowledge application research gap can be used to identify research gaps, but they have different focuses and implications.

The practical research gap refers to the gap between what is known and what needs to be known to solve a practical problem or issue. This type of gap focuses on identifying gaps in knowledge or understanding related to a practical issue or problem. It is often used to identify research questions that are relevant to stakeholders and have the potential to improve practice.

On the other hand, the knowledge application research gap refers to the gap between what is known and what is implemented in practice. This type of gap focuses on identifying barriers to the implementation of evidence-based interventions or strategies in practice. It is often used to identify research questions that aim to improve the translation of research evidence into practice.

To determine which type of gap to focus on for your research, you need to consider the specific problem or issue you are trying to address and the practical implications of your research. If your research aims to generate new knowledge or understanding related to a practical problem or issue, then the practical research gap may be more relevant. If your research aims to improve the implementation of evidence-based interventions or strategies, then the knowledge application research gap may be more relevant.

Ultimately, the most important consideration is to ensure that your research is relevant to stakeholders, addresses a practical problem or issue, and has the potential to improve practice.

Apart from that, you may also have this question in your mind which is how to derive research gap in PhD research? The answer can be reviewing the literature, identifying the key themes, analysing the literature, establishing the research significance and refining the research questions.

The above answer can also help you to know how to derive research gap in doctoral study? So, with this, I am finishing this blog hoping that you have liked this one.

Have any questions in your mind? Then comment below because we are eagerly waiting for your comment. You can also comment on other questions which you have in your mind.

Scientific paper writing for image processing can be availed as a service. Here is how it helps.

Q. How would availing Paper writing service for a subject area like Image Processing going to help me?
A. When you write a scientific document, you must know that you write for a global audience as scientific papers unite scientists across all disciplines, culture and country. A well written scientific paper must necessarily have three attributes:

  • Clarity
  • simplicity
  • Accuracy

But often when research scientists sit in the lab, under the pressure of the pile of books with them, even starting well can get quite challenging.

On a topic like Image Processing, which is purely scientific, the journal writing service would help you to write in a way that the document gets acceptability and appreciation, not just locally but can be identified with, on a global pedestal. This so happens, because the writers have the thorough understanding of the topical development in the area of Image processing and can establish a relevant correlation between what you intend to publish and what already exists, in the most simple way for readers of all genres to understand. Always know that explaining the underlying concepts of your research in simple language is a definite advantage for you and for the community.

Q. I am not good at written communication, will it come in the way of writing a research on Image Processing? What would the skilled writers do different?

A. Effective communication has a hidden advantage in science papers which many naive writers are unaware of. The image that science as a subject shoulders is its biggest problem. It is always thought of as a difficult subject from the very beginning and it is not accessible for people who cannot speak its language. To make this science understandable and accessible and not let it remain impenetrable, it is very important to have good communication skills. The expert writers are great science communicators and they take difficult ideas and express them in the simplest way. This helps to make science accessible and ignites the hunger among the general reader to know more about discoveries that are made in the field of research on everyday basis.

Q. What about the graphics and tables in Image Processing?How would a scientific writer going to enhance them?

A.Graphics are the most eye catching part of scientific papers and the key with them is simplicity. A good graphic is something that can get the message across the reader without a lot of explanatory text. The good writer would make the graphic and tables clear and uncluttered with minimal textual information and moving the additional notes to the footnotes. In addition they would also work on the size and the resolution of the graphics, thus enhancing the overall quality of the document.


Which is the best journal to publish your research paper?

It is a very important and crucial decision, to choose the right journal for your research paper. To begin with, you must pick a journal on the basis of, how nicely your research fits into its broader theme. This isn’t a very difficult task because as a researcher, after having read many papers and explored literature, you will have a fairly good idea about which journal would be the most appropriate and willing to punish your research.
Some fundamental information about the journal can be explored from its website itself and you can be sure that approaching the journal or pursuing it for publication won’t be a waste of effort. However, if you have a couple of journals to shortlist from, the. below mentioned criterion can be of good help:

Positioning in your field of study: The top tier in your field of study may have more than one journal. These would of course be the best known ones and most sought after by scholars in all disciplines. Keeping an eye on the top tier journals is a good idea and you can get more information about them by enquiring from the seasoned faculty in your university who belong to your discipline. Few universities do the task easier for the scholars by already having a ranked list of journals ready for them.

Rate of Acceptance: Journals that have a low rate of acceptance are ideally more competitive and should be targeted for publication of worthy research. However, one should be practical and realistic here and not waste a lot of time eyeing journals that have a very ambitious criterion for selection.

Citation Ranking: This is easy to check through the internet you can check the number of times the publications of that journal have been used by other researchers. More the citations, greater the reputation in the field of study so always look for a journal that’s higher citation ranking as it will increase the possibility of your research also to get noticed.

Indexing of the journal: These days you will find many electronic databases that index journals and if your shortlisted journal is indexed in reputed databases, it is a feather in its cap for its reputation and accessibility as your research would be readily available to other researchers for citations and your primary objective of popularising your research would be fulfilled.

Anna University Annexure I publications: A guide to getting published for PhD

Anna University instructs its scholars to get their research publications for PhD in ISI-indexed journals. ISI is a service that offers access to quality controlled Open Access Journals. The aim of ISI is to have a more comprehensive perspective and encompass all the open access scientific and scholarly journals which are using the right kind of quality control mechanism. It does not even limit itself to any specific languages or subject domains. The reason it has been created is to enhance the visibility of good quality scholarly journals, thus increasing their readability and impact factor as well.

As a scholar, you must know that ISI follows a strict referring process and two to four referees should be there for each submitted manuscript. With the stringent acceptance policies, the acceptance rate is mostly less than 50 per cent.

Within the ISI journals, there are subcategories and levels. The highest level of ISI defines the most original and significant contribution in the field. If a scholar gets a publication in an ISI-indexed journal, it is taken to be a remarkable contribution in the field of study.

The review process for the ISI journals is quite stringent, and one needs to follow a process to select the ISI journal that is most appropriate for the researcher. The journal can be selected with this process:

  1. Choose field of knowledge
  2. Determine journals’ Impact Factor and Quartiles
  3. Select the journals within the quartile (Q1, Q2, Q3)
  4. For all journals selected, visit their website
  5. Check type of works accepted (Review, Original research article, Letters, etc.)
  6. Check the turnaround time for articles submitted to the journal
  7. Check number of publications per year
  8. Check type of fees associated
  9. Check whether it has online edition
  10. Check the length and structure of the manuscript acceptable to the journal

Here is a flow chart of how the Review Process the journals at ISI normally follow:

review process IS journals

You must have the following considerations in place before you think your research paper is complete to be sent at ISI:

  1. First of all give an honest opinion to yourself that your research is worth publishing
  2. Answer whether my research has substantive contribution to make in the field of study or the literature under study?
  3. What are the steps needed to be cleared before the submission in the chosen journal?
  4. How can I increase the citations of my published research by selecting the most appropriate journal?

Other than knowing the guidelines for getting your paper selected for publication in one of these worthy journals, you must also know the reasons because of which your paper may get rejected by the journal for a more thorough preparation. But once you get prepared with your manuscript, your quest for the most suitable ISI journal begins. We can make your this quest easy and can help you figure out that one perfect ISI journal, write to us at


Choosing the Right Topic for Your Scientific Manuscript

Over the past 50 years, there has been a prolific increase in the number of published scientific journals and manuscripts globally. Available abstracts of scientific meetings and papers are a great source of assimilating information for publishing manuscripts, however, less than half of these abstracts are ever published as articles in scientific journals.

There are a number of reasons for a failed manuscript including lack of research time, negative research results, and delay in completion of research projects. Additionally, choosing the right topic for your manuscript can increase the chances of getting published.

You can choose the right scientific topic for your manuscript based on the following points:

  • The type of manuscript.Manuscript type generally falls in the following categories:
  • Full articles, or completed piece of research.
  • Review papers, which provides your perspective on a current topic.
  • Letters, which are a shorter version of the full articles, and are used for quick communication of new scientific advances.

When working on a manuscript, evaluate your work and determine which of these categories do it fall under.

  • Ensure that your manuscript topic is publishable.
    Question your scientific hypothesis as follows and examine the answers:
  • Is my hypothesis hard and interesting?
  • Will I face numerous challenges in my research work?
  • Is my work related to a current topic?
  • Do I have any solutions for this difficult problem?If the answers are yes, then you are set for writing a publishable manuscript.
  • Choose the right scientific journal.Do not try to write a manuscript aimed at publishing them in multiple scientific journals. Select one or two journals of your choice, which are the right platform for advancing your scientific idea. Study the recent publications of the target journals to know the type of article topics that they accept. As rejection rates of popular scientific journals are high, wait for the response from the editorial team before sending your manuscript to another.
  • Start with the research databases.You can start by looking for topics of interest in at least a few credible research databases. Avoid databases that only contain scientific papers, published more than 10 years back. Keep a note of published research papers and journals that can added as references and citations in your manuscript.

In conclusion, you must be able to cherish your manuscript topic first, irrespective of whether it gets published or not.

Do Not Write Your Manuscript Like This

Each time you are planning to publish a paper, it is generally anticipated that you will read thoroughly instructions or guidelines for authors. It actually helps you ensure that your manuscript is written and published according to the standards of the journal. But the fact is that very few authors rigidly follow the instructions. Even though you may eventually edit your manuscript in accordance with the instructions, still you need to remember a few points to ensure that your manuscript is mistake free. So, let us now discuss how not to write your manuscript.

Do not write inconsistent manuscript
If you research, you will come to know that most of the authors do not maintain consistency while writing a paper. The words usage is not uniform throughout the manuscript. If you do not maintain consistency, it can lead to extreme confusion for the editors. For instance, if you are using the word “girl” for a particular individual in your paper, keep referring to the individual as girl throughout the manuscript. Do not use the word “female” or “lady”. It can create confusion.

Do not use wrong citations
Before writing the manuscript, do check the type of citation which your intended journal accepts. The fact is that various citation styles are used, like numbers, alphanumeric, name and year and so on. So, if you choose the wrong citations, you may eventually end up correcting the mistakes later on, which can consume significant amount of your time. So, check out the citation style which is accepted by the journal and then use citations accordingly.

Do not use wrong reference styling
Similar to citations, nowadays different journals have their separate reference styling and formatting. Do you know that nowadays manuscripts are largely rejected due to wrong reference styling? So, ensure that you are using the right reference styling before drafting your manuscript.

Do not use self-created abbreviations
If you research, you will discover that various authors use non-standard and self-created abbreviations in their manuscript. They actually forget or ignore the fact that their manuscript is going to be published internationally as well and will therefore have a global reach. For this reason, using non-standard and self-created abbreviations should be ignored. In fact, the authors need to use abbreviations that are standard and largely used by all both nationally and globally.

Consider the aforementioned points and do not make these mistakes in your manuscript.

Why Manuscript Writing is Dreadful

Manuscript writing can be really problematic whether you are a novice or an experienced researcher from the point of view of the length, duration, complexity and grammar.. There are a lot of issues professional authors also face while creating manuscripts. This includes redundancy and grammtical errors. Whether you are creating a manuscript for academic or non academic works, the task is extremely cumbersome in itself.

1.  Grammar: Getting It Right
This is one of the biggest hurdles while writing your manuscript. You may think…how hard could it be? I know basic grammar! But when an experienced person comes up with a professionally written manuscript, you will know the difference.A key to making content presentable, attractive and appealing is to ensure it is grammatically correct, interesting to read and unique in terms of its presentation.  If there are grammatical errors, it creates a very bad impression on the reader.If you want to come up with the perfect manuscript, opt for professional services and see the difference for yourself. From every serial comma to semi colon, a professionally written and edited manuscript can be the perfect step to a publishing success.

2.  Time: Every Minute Counts
If manuscripts have to be ready within the timeframe required and have the degree of complexity and uniqueness needed within that period, the problem of time management comes to the fore. Writing manuscripts can be tedious and time-consuming. Authors can save the time they would have otherwise spent poring over the manuscript. When it comes to publishing your own book or academic work, a well-written manuscript requires a lot of time commitment. You may have prepared the initial draft but have no time for the final version? Welcome to the world of a busy author or researcher! The way out is to opt for a professional writer. These people are experienced in the field and have no limitations such as time constraints.

3.  Effort Another Crucial Problem
Another constraint is the person’s efforts for writing a manuscript. This is why manuscript writing is dreadful. Cross checking references and writing top quality content is not an easy task and saving effort by giving the work to a professional can avert a lot of headaches. Manuscript writing services helps the client to be able to cut down on the monumental strain of having to come up with the perfect words (and manuscript!)